Cases 51 - 60 of 133
In re: Lester Eiland
as 17-3750
Petitioner:
In re: LESTER EILAND
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Darrell Taylor v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 17-3737
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Eliseo Navedo v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 17-3332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELISEO NAVEDO
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Edward Mitchell v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 17-3118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Tito McGill v. Superintendent Coal Township S, et al
as 17-2973
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TITO MCGILL
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
In re: John Jackson
as 17-2919
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN ROLAND JACKSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
In re: Michael Fernsler
as 17-2860
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL DAVID FERNSLER
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Tyshaunt Love v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 17-2176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYSHAUNT LOVE
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY and SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
Shonari Warren v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 17-2065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHONARI WARREN
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Reginald Scott v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 17-1931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD C. SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
