Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Arnold et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv03612
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Arnold , Vicky Arnold , David E. Bowles and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DICKERSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2012cv05585
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DICKERSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
NEW JERSEY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS et al v. DICKERSON CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
as 3:2012cv05324
Petitioner:
NEW JERSEY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS and NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
DICKERSON CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
DICKERSON v. BANK OF AMERICA
as 1:2012cv03922
Plaintiff:
RITA DICKERSON
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DICKERSON v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2011cv06010
Plaintiff:
VALERIE DICKERSON
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , ABC COS. 1-100, JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREICHS v. LIFESTAR RESPONSE CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv04460
Plaintiff:
KAREN ANN FREICHS
Defendant:
LIFESTAR RESPONSE CORP., JIM DICKERSON, JR., JOHN COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
DICKERSON v. APPLE COMPUTER, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv01188
Plaintiff:
DAMONE DICKERSON
Defendant:
APPLE COMPUTER, INC., AT&T MOBILITY LLC and AT&T, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
FERNANDEZ v. HOMEBANC,LLC et al
as 2:2007cv05950
Plaintiff:
JAIME FERNANDEZ
Defendant:
HOMEBANC,LLC, CROSSROADS TITLE SERVICES, INC., INDYMACBANK, FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
