Cases 51 - 60 of 88
VanDam v. Gordon et al
as 2:2012cv00809
Plaintiff:
Stephen M. VanDam
Defendant:
Derick Gordon, Alfred Bigelow, Wayne Freestone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Verney et al v. Turn About Ranch et al
as 2:2012cv00590
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Verney and Julia Gordon
Defendant:
Turn About Ranch and Aspen Education Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner v. Mylan Technologies et al
as 2:2012cv00219
Plaintiff:
Gordon Turner
Defendant:
Mylan Technologies and Mylan Pharmaceuticals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maez v. Gordon et al
as 2:2011cv01118
Plaintiff:
Michael Maez
Defendant:
FNU Gordon and FNU Whitney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fankhanel et al v. Filiaga
as 2:2011cv00797
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Fankhanel , Jon Buchman , Ellis Estevez and others
Defendant:
William Filiaga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gordon et al v. Federal Nation Mortgage Association
as 2:2011cv00624
Plaintiff:
Brent Gordon , M. G. , S. G. and others
Defendant:
Federal Nation Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Western States Contracting et al v. Spilsbury et al
as 2:2010cv01141
Plaintiff:
Western States Contracting , Triton Grading & Paving and Gordon Spilker Huber Geotechnical Consultants
Defendant:
Jerald M. Spilsbury, Summit DM, Toquerville Enterprises and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00689
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Talbot et al v. US Extradition Services et al
as 2:2010cv00578
Plaintiff:
Robert James Talbot and Linda Charlotte Talbot
Defendant:
US Extradition Services, Gordon Brooks and Gregory Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Got Saggy Bags? v. Gordon
as 2:2010cv00287
Plaintiff:
Got Saggy Bags?
Defendant:
Ray V. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
