Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Beltran v. Smith et al
as 3:2010cv00457
Petitioner:
Guillermo Beltran
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Greg Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ebeling v. Smith et al
as 3:2010cv00356
Petitioner:
Gregg Ebeling
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Greg Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Villaverde v. Smith et al
as 3:2010cv00347
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General
Defendant:
Warden Greg Smith
Petitioner:
Sally D. Villaverde
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Mar et al
as 3:2010cv00282
Defendant:
Robert Bannister, Correctional Nurse Robert Crum, Terri Jacobs and others
Plaintiff:
Ty Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Quevedo v. Smith et al
as 3:2010cv00200
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Greg Smith
Petitioner:
Carlos Quevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Smith et al
as 3:2010cv00194
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Nevada and Greg Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kamedula v. Bannister et al
as 3:2010cv00160
Defendant:
Robert B. Bannister, Shelia Barth, Robert Crum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kamedula v. Smith et al
as 3:2010cv00153
:
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Greg Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Skolnik et al
as 2:2010cv00365
Defendant:
James Baca, Cheryl Burson, Mary Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada et al
as 3:2009cv00571
Petitioner:
Dale Dallas Craig
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Greg Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
