Cases 51 - 60 of 110
BHRAC-AC LLC et al v. Caudill
as 1:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
BHRAC-AC LLC and Beverly Hills Leasing
Defendant:
Robert Leroy Caudill
Counter_claimant:
Robert Leroy Caudill
Counter_defendant:
BHRAC-AC LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Georgelas v. Hill
as 2:2016cv00522
Plaintiff:
Tammy B. Georgelas
Defendant:
David Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Georgelas v. Desert Hill Ventures
as 2:2016cv00514
Plaintiff:
Tammy B. Georgelas
Defendant:
Desert Hill Ventures
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Addiction Treatment Centers et al v. Shadow Mountain et al
as 2:2016cv00339
Plaintiff:
Addiction Treatment Centers and St. George Detox Center
Defendant:
Shadow Mountain, Round Hill Services, David Skelton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carrington Mortgage Services v. Gomez et al
as 2:2016cv00276
Plaintiff:
Carrington Mortgage Services
Defendant:
Debra Gomez, Kaylynn Gygi, Michael Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anderson v. McClellan et al
as 2:2016cv00271
Plaintiff:
Greg Anderson
Defendant:
Clark A. McClellan, Third District Court , Daniel W. Kitchen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey's General Stores et al v. Visa et al
as 2:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
Casey's General Stores , Casey's Marketing Company , Casey's Retail Company and others
Defendant:
Visa, Visa USA Inc, Visa International Service and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Webb v. State of Utah et al
as 1:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
David Webb
Defendant:
State of Utah, Alpine City, American Fork City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Carrington Mortgage Services v. Gomez et al
as 2:2016cv00037
Plaintiff:
Carrington Mortgage Services
Defendant:
Debra Gomez, Kaylynn Gygi, Michael Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
