Cases 51 - 60 of 1,023
USA v. John Gowder
as 23-13441
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN MICHAEL GOWDER
LORENZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04033
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL LORENZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HYDLE JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10243
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL HYDLE JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
John McLeod v. Michael Bryant, et al
as 23-1721
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MICHAEL MCLEOD
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL BRYANT, Revenue Agent and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Charles Rettig, Commissioner
COLLINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06670
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL COLLINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THERIOT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv05975
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL THERIOT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHANE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06181
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL SHANE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WASHINGTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02828
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL WASHINGTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RIGGI v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02627
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL RIGGI
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
