Cases 51 - 60 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
England v. Knight Adjustment Bureau
as 1:2011cv00002
Plaintiff:
Teresa England
Defendant:
Knight Adjustment Bureau
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Young v. Knight Adjustment Bureau
as 1:2010cv00208
Plaintiff:
Desiree Young
Defendant:
Knight Adjustment Bureau
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Knight et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing et al
as 2:2010cv00898
Plaintiff:
Steven Knight and Sara Knight
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing and Recontrust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Knight Brothers v. Barer Engineering Company of America et al
as 2:2010cv00108
Plaintiff:
Knight Brothers and Knight Brothers
Defendant:
Barer Engineering Company of America, Barer Engineering Company of America, Barer Engineering International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Knight Brothers v. Voith Hydro et al
as 2:2009cv01003
Plaintiff:
Knight Brothers, Knight Brothers and Knight Brothers
Defendant:
Voith Hydro and Voith Hydro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Knight Adjustment Bureau v. Livingston
as 2:2009cv00670
Plaintiff:
Knight Adjustment Bureau
Defendant:
Dale Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Gillen et al v. Granite Furniture Company et al
as 2:2009cv00427
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Gillen and Lynn Gillen
Defendant:
Granite Furniture Company, Issac K. James, Richards Kimble & Winn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
