Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 51 - 60 of 83
WILLIAMS v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016mc01154
Plaintiff: RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant: LORETTA E. LYNCH and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00987
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00862
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MANDHADI et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2016cv00712
Defendant: JEH JOHNSON , LORETTA E. LYNCH , LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff: KIRAN KUMAR MANDHADI and SRILAKSHMI PRIYA KUNKU
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00693
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
LEAVITT v. OBAMA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00678
Plaintiff: OWEN D. LEAVITT
Defendant: BARACK H. OBAMA, LORETTA E. LYNCH and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2016cv00679
Plaintiff: DERRICK LAVELL WILLIAMS
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LORETTA E. LYNCH, JOHN WALSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00682
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
HAN v. LYNCH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00601
Petitioner: JEONG SEON HAN
Respondent: LORETTA E. LYNCH and PAUL F. ZUKUNFT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LYUBCHENKO v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2016cv00589
Plaintiff: SVETLANA LYUBCHENKO
Defendant: SARAH TAYLOR, LEON RODRIGUEZ, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?