Cases 51 - 60 of 75
MAMMADOVA et al v. DECKER et al
as 3:2008cv00501
Petitioner:
Esmira Mammadova and Tengiz Mammadov
Respondent:
Thomas R. Decker, Thomas R. Decker, Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
McDonald v. Decker et al
as 1:2008cv00496
Petitioner:
Carrington McDonald
Respondent:
Thomas Decker and Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00430
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AUGUSTINE v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv01098
Petitioner:
BIJUMON K. AUGUSTINE
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zheng v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv00223
Petitioner:
Luo Fei Zheng and Luo Fei Zheng
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, Julie Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00184
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
TRELLI v. DEPARMNT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 2:2008cv00448
Petitioner:
SUSHI MA TRELLI
Respondent:
DEPARMNT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and MICHAEL MUKASEY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00160
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00439
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
