Cases 51 - 60 of 132
ROSS v. NOGAN et al
as 1:2019cv06595
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and PATRICK NOGAN
Petitioner:
LENNY ROSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RANDALL v. NOGAN et al
as 1:2018cv17638
Petitioner:
DONALD RANDALL
Respondent:
MR. PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2018cv17321
Defendant:
JOSEPH SANTIAGO, JAMES JONES and PATRICK NOGAN
Plaintiff:
ERIC WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv17296
Defendant:
MAJOR JONES, SCO CHAVES, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
LASHAWN JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANCHEZ v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2018cv13475
Petitioner:
VICTOR SANCHEZ
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and PATRICK NOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SALAZAR v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv11185
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF STATE OF NEW JERSEY and PATRICK NOGAN
Petitioner:
ALBERTO SALAZAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MACKOON v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2018cv10150
Petitioner:
DAVID MACKOON
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2018cv09593
Plaintiff:
BARRY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, PATRICK NOGAN and CLAVIG SPIRES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERO v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2018cv09105
Petitioner:
JULIO C. RIVERO
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROACH v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2018cv08090
Petitioner:
REGINALD WAYNE ROACH
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and PATRICK NOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
