Cases 51 - 60 of 81
Boaz v. Smith et al
as 4:2017cv04111
Plaintiff:
Michael L Boaz
Defendant:
Jason Smith, Gary Kulhan, . Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carpenter v. Clayton et al
as 4:2017cv04080
Plaintiff:
Jermaine D Carpenter
Defendant:
James C Clayton, Rodney Woods, Paula Lodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Racanelli v. Hankins et al
as 4:2017cv04074
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Racanelli
Defendant:
Joseph Hankins, Paula Lodge and Any and all other unnamed or unknown persons to have participated in the violations complained herein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carpenter v. Scott et al
as 4:2016cv04275
Plaintiff:
Jermaine D Carpenter
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Eric Kunkell, James C Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jermaine Carpenter v. Lisa Steffans, et al
as 16-4232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERMAINE D. CARPENTER
Defendant - Appellee:
LISA STEFFANS, AMY LOUCK, Doctor, BRANDON WEAR and others
William Swanson v. Joseph Hankins, et al
as 16-4109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SWANSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH HANKINS, Public Service Administrator, SHAN JUMPER, SHARLENE CARAWAY, Assistant Clinical Director and others
Koster v. Liberty Healthcare Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv04216
Plaintiff:
Michael T Koster
Defendant:
Liberty Healthcare Corporation, Shan Jumper, Sharlene Caraway and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Tucker v. Wilcoxen et al
as 4:2016cv04202
Plaintiff:
Edward Tucker
Defendant:
Krista Wilcoxen, Joseph Hankins, John Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kugler v. Lodge et al
as 4:2016cv04148
Plaintiff:
Devin Kugler
Defendant:
Paula Lodge, William Barnes, Jackie White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shanklin v. Dimas et al
as 4:2016cv04144
Plaintiff:
Reginald Shanklin
Defendant:
James T Dimas, Herbert Caskey, Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
