Cases 51 - 60 of 293
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Outlaw-Soderlind et al
as 0:2015cv02330
Defendant:
Dalton Brady Outlaw-Soderlind, Cerresso Fort, Element Boxing and Fitness LLC and others
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Wyoming, City of v. Procter & Gamble Company et al
as 0:2015cv02101
Plaintiff:
Wyoming, City of
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Company, Kimberly-Clark Corporation , Nice-Pak Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MedSource International, LLC v. Care 2 Medical Products, Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv01623
Plaintiff:
MedSource International, LLC
Defendant:
Care 2 Medical Products, Inc., Care 2 Innovations, Inc. and Steven Thomas Islava
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nifty Home Products, Inc. v. Pretty Star Store, LLC
as 0:2015cv01576
Plaintiff:
Nifty Home Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Pretty Star Store, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Ewers v. Solid Rock Productions, Inc.
as 0:2015cv00591
Plaintiff:
Garrett Ewers
Defendant:
Solid Rock Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
L'Image Home Products Inc. v. Holin
as 0:2015cv00184
Defendant:
Brad J. Holin
Plaintiff:
L'Image Home Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Johnston v. Zimmer Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv00137
Plaintiff:
Barbara A. Johnston
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pruka v. Zimmer Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv00133
Plaintiff:
Nancy Pruka
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nifty Home Products, Inc. v. Hertaus
as 0:2014cv05027
Plaintiff:
Nifty Home Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Alan Hertaus
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Nifty Home Products, Inc. v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.
as 0:2014cv04985
Plaintiff:
Nifty Home Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
