Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Ramos v. Commissioner of SSA
as 1:2010cv01731
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Ramos
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Avila-Ramos v. Shartle
as 4:2010cv00994
Petitioner:
Wilfredo Avila-Ramos
Respondent:
J.T. Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramos v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2010cv00940
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ramos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Turner v. Websta's Aviation Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02802
Plaintiff:
Chris Turner
Defendant:
Websta's Aviation Services, Inc. and Ramo, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Airline Crash
Clapp et al v. Websta's Aviation Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02795
Plaintiff:
Alexander Kent Clapp and Jason Clapp
Defendant:
Websta's Aviation Services, Inc., Websta's Aviation Services, Inc., Websta's Aviation Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Airline Crash
Andrews v. Ramos
as 1:2009cv02686
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Andrews
Defendant:
Mrs. Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ramos, et al v. Air Liquide America Corporation et al
as 1:2007wf17129
Defendant:
Deloro Stellite Company, Inc., Fibre-Metal Products Company, Illinois Tool Works, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Josephine S.K. Ramos and Porcopio Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos, Jr. v. Gansheimer
as 1:2009cv00506
Petitioner:
Luis D. Ramos, Jr.
Respondent:
Rich Gansheimer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ramos et al v. Lincoln Electric Company et al
as 1:2008wf17977
Plaintiff:
Philip Ramos, Jr.
Defendant:
Lincoln Electric Company, Hobart Brothers Company, ESAB Group, Inc. and others
Debtor:
BOC Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
