Cases 51 - 60 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00097
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Choi v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2025cv00092
Plaintiff:
Hye Ja Choi
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Universal Services of America, LP et al v. Corbett
as 1:2025cv00081
Plaintiff:
Universal Services of America, LP and Universal Protection Service, LP doing business as Allied Universal Security Services
Defendant:
Jordan Corbett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00565
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Su v. Hawaii Care and Cleaning, Inc., et al
as 1:2024cv00567
Defendant:
Hawaii Care and Cleaning, Inc., Alacrity Employment Services, Amy Galtes and others
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Joseph of the Family Ortiz v. Kilgore
as 1:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ortiz
Defendant:
Child Support Services of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
