Cases 51 - 60 of 71
Mays v. State of Kansas et al
as 5:2009cv03059
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Mays
Respondent:
State of Kansas, J. Shelton, Kansas Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Green v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2009cv03055
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Green
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, Charlton D. Lawhorn, Kathleen Sebelius and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Floyd v. Richardson
as 5:2009cv03016
Plaintiff:
Ted Riley Floyd
Defendant:
Shelton Richardson
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Floyd v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2009cv03023
Plaintiff:
Ted Riley Floyd
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Shelton Richardson, United States Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Still v. Richardson et al
as 5:2008cv03309
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jay Still
Defendant:
Shelton Richardson, Robert Mundt and (fnu) Moore
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Christy v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2008cv03256
Plaintiff:
Richard L Christy
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Unknown Transportation Officers, (fnu) McCandles and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shaw v. Richardson et al
as 5:2008cv03248
Plaintiff:
Alton R Shaw
Defendant:
Shelton Richardson, Robert Mundt, Bruce Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sandstrom v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2008cv03245
Plaintiff:
Steven M Sandstrom
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Shelton Richardson, Robert Mundt and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Floyd v. Richardson
as 5:2008cv03229
Petitioner:
Ted Riley Floyd
Respondent:
Shelton Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Richardson et al
as 5:2008cv03226
Petitioner:
Michael A Banks
Respondent:
Shelton Richardson, Correctional Corporation of America and US Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
