Cases 51 - 60 of 71
BUTRIM v. D'ILIO et al
as 1:2014cv04628
Petitioner:
ROBERT BUTRIM
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HILL v. D'ILIO
as 3:2014cv04602
Petitioner:
ROBERT R. HILL
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALLEN v. MR. STEPHEN D'ILIO et al
as 3:2014cv04492
Petitioner:
JOHN LEE ALLEN, JR.
Respondent:
MR. STEPHEN D'ILIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FITZGERALD v. D'ILIO et al
as 2:2014cv04025
Petitioner:
JOHN FITZGERALD
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHARRIEFF v. D'ILIO et al
as 2:2014cv03840
Petitioner:
JIHAD SHARRIEFF
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. D'ILIO et al
as 3:2014cv03706
Petitioner:
ROBERT R. HILL
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PORTER v. D'ILIO et al
as 2:2014cv02999
Petitioner:
OSCAR PORTER
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DENNIS v. D'ILLO et al
as 2:2014cv02136
Petitioner:
ANDRE DENNIS
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO and PAULA T. DOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ABDUL-AZIZ et al v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2014cv02026
Plaintiff:
SHAROB ABDUL-AZIZ, WILLIAM MCCRAY, IBN PASHA and others
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, STEPHEN D'ILIO, ANDREW P. SIDAMON-ERISTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. D'ILIO et al
as 3:2014cv02032
Petitioner:
DUQUIE SIMMONS
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO and JOHN J. HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
