Cases 51 - 60 of 427
1827 Wilson Street LLC et al v. Sterling
as 0:2023cv60228
Plaintiff:
1827 Wilson Street LLC and 1819 Wilson Street LLC doing business as Bernard Apts
Defendant:
Chris Sterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Sterling et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv10662
Plaintiff:
Todd Sterling and Amy Sterling
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boudreaux, Jr. v. Ajanta Pharma USA Inc et al
as 3:2023cv10503
Plaintiff:
Sterling Boudreaux, Jr.
Defendant:
Ajanta Pharma USA Inc, Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, Apotex Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PRAYON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02659
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EDWARD STERLING PRAYON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JAMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02259
Plaintiff:
STERLING JAMES, III.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abreu v. Sterling Jewelers Inc.
as 1:2023cv20080
Plaintiff:
Jose Rafael Abreu
Defendant:
Sterling Jewelers Inc. a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as Kay Jewelers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
TRELOGGEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21958
Plaintiff:
MARC STERLING TRELOGGEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CHRISTIAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20275
Plaintiff:
STERLING CHRISTIAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
