Cases 51 - 60 of 78
CASAGRANDE et al v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00769
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE CASAGRANDE , JOHN S. CASAGRANDE and ALEXANDRIA ELIZABETH PIAZZA
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. , MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC , DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
THE ESTATE OF H. FRED CLARK v. THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK et al
as 2:2012cv06259
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF H. FRED CLARK
Defendant:
THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK , TD BANK, N.A. , T-MOBILE USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC v. RUSH REALTY COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv06091
Plaintiff:
T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC
Defendant:
RUSH REALTY COMPANY, INC., W. JAMES KERNAGHAN, III and ON TARGET ACQUISITION LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
FAIR v. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05492
Plaintiff:
THERESA FAIR
Defendant:
SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. and T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
USA/Postal Inspector v. Grey, Pantech AT&T Mobile Phone
as 1:2012mc00073
Plaintiff:
USA/Postal Inspector
Defendant:
Grey, Pantech AT&T Mobile Phone
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv07838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Fetterolf v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv02259
Plaintiff:
Dorothy J. Fetterolf
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services, LLC and AT&T Umbrella Plan No. 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv06193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
