Cases 51 - 60 of 72
Whipple v. T.D.C.J. Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2012cv00226
Defendant:
CO I Amber B. Benson, CO V Suzanne M. Campbell, Audrey A. England and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Jean Whipple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. The United States of America Government et al
as 4:2012cv01199
Plaintiff:
Ellery Cornelius Oliver
Defendant:
The United States of America Government, The United States Supreme Court, The United States Congress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franco v. T.D.C.J.
as 3:2012cv00097
Defendant:
T.D.C.J.
Plaintiff:
Martin T. Franco, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franco v. T.D.C.J.
as 4:2012cv00739
Defendant:
T.D.C.J.
Plaintiff:
Martin T. Franco, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. T.D.C.J. or employees et al
as 5:2010cv00741
Plaintiff:
Jose Felipe Flores
Defendant:
T.D.C.J. or employees and U.T.M.B. Medical Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. T.D.C.J. or employees et al DO NO DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 2:2010cv00282
Plaintiff:
Jose Felipe Flores
Defendant:
T.D.C.J. or employees and U.T.M.B. Medical Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kupstis v. Davis et al
as 1:2010cv00157
Plaintiff:
Mark Kupstis
Defendant:
Donald nmi Davis, Patrick nmi Martin, Jancy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kupstis v. Davis et al
as 1:2010cv00409
Defendant:
259th District Court, Field Officer Donald Davis, Director, T.D.C.J. and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Kupstis
T.D.C.J:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. T.D.C.J. Director
as 3:2010cv00205
Petitioner:
Tarron Allen
Respondent:
T.D.C.J. Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Siegel v. T.D.C.J. Director
as 4:2010cv00754
Petitioner:
Nathan Dustin Heath Siegel
Respondent:
T.D.C.J. Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
