Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv01585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BAKER et al v. H&P CAPITAL, INC.
as 3:2011cv00025
Plaintiff:
BOBBY BAKER , MICHAEL CONKLIN , HELEN DANIELS-TINSLEY and others
Defendant:
H&P Capital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Adrianne Roggenbuck Trust et al v. Development Resources Group, LLC et al
as 6:2009cv02158
Plaintiff:
Adrianne Roggenbuck Trust, AH Property Holdings, LLC, Albert Alunni and others
Defendant:
Development Resources Group, LLC, Legacy Dunes Condominium, LLC, Michael Halpin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Adrianne Roggenbuck Trust et al v. Development Resources Group, LLC et al
as 6:2009cv02056
Plaintiff:
Adrianne Roggenbuck Trust, Adrianne Roggenbuck Trust, Adrianne Roggenbuck Trust and others
Defendant:
Development Resources Group, LLC, Legacy Dunes Condominium, LLC, Michael K. Halpin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tinsley v. State of Florida et al
as 0:2008cv61829
Plaintiff:
Earl Tinsley
Defendant:
State of Florida and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tinsley v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2008cv61829
Plaintiff:
Earl Tinsley
Defendant:
State of Florida and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2007cv02203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tinsley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2007cv00482
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Tinsley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
