Cases 51 - 60 of 188
Washington State, et al v. Chimei Innolux Corp., et al
as 11-80051
Plaintiff - Respondent:
WASHINGTON STATE, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, as parens patriae on behalf of natural persons residing in the state, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
CHIMEI INNOLUX CORP., CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC., CMO JAPAN CO., LTD. and others
AU Optronics Corporation, et al v. USDCSF, et al
as 10-71745
:
In re: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Petitioner:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Respondent:
USDC, SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant:
EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Real Party In Interest:
CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. Hannstar Display Corporation, et al
as 10-16215
In Re:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION
Defendant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, CHI MEI INNOLUX and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 10-16182
In Re:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Defendant:
CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD and others
ATS Claim, LLC v. Epson Electronics America, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01115
Plaintiff:
ATS Claim, LLC
Defendant:
Epson Electronics America, Inc., Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Toshiba Corporation, et al v. USDC-CAN
as 08-74803
:
In re: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA MATSUSHITA DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC. and others
Petitioner:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA MATSUSHITA DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC. and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
JUDD ELIASOPH, On Behalf Of Himself, And Others Similarly Situated and PHELPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., On Behalf Of Itself, And Others Simiraly Situated
Princeton Display Technologies, Inc. v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, LTD. et al
as 3:2008cv02205
Plaintiff:
Princeton Display Technologies, Inc., Princeton Display Technologies, Inc., Princeton Display Technologies, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Chunghwa Picture Tubes, LTD., Chunghwa Picture Tubes (Malaysia) Sdn.Bhd., LG Electronics, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Industrial Computing, Inc. v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, LTD. et al
as 3:2008cv01627
Plaintiff:
Industrial Computing, Inc.
Defendant:
Chunghwa Picture Tubes, LTD., Chunghwa Picture Tubes (Malaysia) SDN.BHD, LG Electronics, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PRINCETON DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD. et al
as 2:2007cv05713
Plaintiff:
PRINCETON DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD., CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES (MALAYSIA) Sdn. Bhd., LG ELECTRONICS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
IMCA, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv05348
Plaintiff:
IMCA, Inc.
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
