Cases 51 - 60 of 170
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2020cv81573
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2020cv81572
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Insurance Company of North America Taiwan Branch v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. et al
as 0:2020cv61817
Plaintiff:
Insurance Company of North America Taiwan Branch a/s/o Scandinavian Health Ltd., Taiwan Branch, and SHL Pharma LLC and Insurance Company of North America Taiwan Branch
Defendant:
United Parcel Service of Americ, Inc., Eva Air Cargo and United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garvey v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 4:2020cv10089
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Garvey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv61376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mathews v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 8:2020cv01069
Plaintiff:
Adrian Mathews
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Roig et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv21628
Plaintiff:
Gail Olivera, Kyle Roig, Sam Roig and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Romaine Seguin and Thomas O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roig et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 0:2020cv60811
Plaintiff:
Gail Olivera, Kyle Roig, Sam Roig and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Romaine Seguin and Thomas O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oliver v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC.
as 9:2020cv80094
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC.
Plaintiff:
Courtney Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
