Cases 51 - 60 of 90
Wade v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2016cv00517
Plaintiff:
John P. Wade, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wade et al v. The Anthem Companies et al
as 1:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
Shelia Wade
Defendant:
Anthem Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Margaret Ruiz et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00120
Plaintiff:
Margaret E Ruiz , Arette Barnes , Alyce Bolowskie and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tory Stucker et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
Tory Stucker , Melody Trent , Wales Trent and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Wade et al
as 5:2014cv00464
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Nancy Wade and Unknown Spouse of Nancy Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Wade et al v. Swegles et al
as 2:2014cv00106
Plaintiff:
Mitchael Wade and Hazel Diane Wade
Defendant:
Joseph Swegles , Saint Elizabeth Medical Center and Centers For Medicare And Medicaid Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Wade v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00132
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Wade
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Drake et al v. United States Enrichment Corporation, Inc.
as 5:2013cv00223
Plaintiff:
Bryan L. Drake , Angela N. Allison , James Robert Bone and others
Defendant:
United States Enrichment Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Conley v. SSA
as 7:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Wade Conley
Defendant:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
