Cases 51 - 57 of 57
Bosley et al v. Guidant Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv02854
Plaintiff:
Charles Bosley, Sr., Charles Bosley, Sr., Robert Debrinsky and others
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Webb v. KCQ, Inc et al
as 0:2007cv02564
Plaintiff:
Margery L Webb
Defendant:
KCQ, Inc and Canneidigh, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Webb v. Guidant Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv02216
Plaintiff:
James Webb, James Webb and James Webb
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Telemedia Solutions, Inc v. Myers et al
as 0:2007cv01540
Plaintiff:
Telemedia Solutions, Inc and Telemedia Solutions, Inc
Defendant:
David E Myers, David E Myers, Anthony Webb and others
Counter Claimant:
Integrated Structural Solutions, Inc, David E Myers and Anthony Webb
Counter Defendant:
Telemedia Solutions, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Spahm et al v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2007cv01028
Plaintiff:
Rey Spahm, Rey Spahm, Nikki L Webb and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Webb et al v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2007cv00760
Plaintiff:
Ralph Webb and Jacqueline Webb
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
In Re: Retek Inc Securities, et al v. , et al
as 0:2002cv04209
Plaintiff:
Friends of Ariel Center for Policy Research , Louisiana Municipal Police Employee's Retirement System , Harvey Solomon and others
Defendant:
Retek Inc , John Buchanan , Steven D Ladwig and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
