Cases 51 - 60 of 62
PAIGE v. SECRETARY OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2015cv00025
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HENRY PAIGE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Crews
as 0:2013cv62560
Plaintiff:
William Henry Thomas
Defendant:
Michael D. Crews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ringwood v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00265
Petitioner:
William Henry Ringwood
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Williams et al
as 0:2013cv60344
Plaintiff:
William Henry Robinson
Defendant:
Gerard Williams and Karen Weiss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. United States
as 2:2012cv14371
Petitioner:
William Henry Spencer
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Adams et al v. Sheriff of Duval County et al
as 3:2012cv00762
Plaintiff:
William Henry Adams, III and Howard Jesse Carroll
Defendant:
Sheriff of Duval County and Duval County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry v. The Merchant Vessel APL Egypt
as 1:2010cv21637
Plaintiff:
William Henry Larry, Jr
Defendant:
The Merchant Vessel APL Egypt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
DUDLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2009cv00375
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HENRY DUDLEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hiscocks et al v. KA and KM Development, Inc.
as 6:2009cv00185
Plaintiff:
William Henry Hiscocks and Tina Susan Hiscocks
Defendant:
KA and KM Development, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hollander et al v. KA and KM Development, Inc.
as 6:2008cv02132
Plaintiff:
Stephen Elson, Sheela Indran, William Henry Hiscocks and others
Defendant:
KA and KM Development, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
