Cases 51 - 60 of 104
Kapea v. Young Brothers, Limited
as 1:2013cv00416
Plaintiff:
Leonard Kapea
Defendant:
Young Brothers, Limited
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
What v. Honolulu Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv00373
Plaintiff:
Sally What
Defendant:
Honolulu Police Department, Hawaii Women's Health, Queen's Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Quinata v. Nishimura et al
as 1:2013cv00339
Plaintiff:
Anna Quinata
Defendant:
Rhonda Nishimura , BMW Bank of North America , Cades Shutte LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nova Casualty Company v. Kim
as 1:2013cv00217
Plaintiff:
Nova Casualty Company
Defendant:
Jay Young Kim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Young v. Sears Holding Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00080
Plaintiff:
Beverly A. Young
Defendant:
Sears Holding Corporation, Sears, Roebuck and Co. , Husqvarna AB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Brigham Young University-Hawaii v. Hamberger Industriewerke GmbH et al
as 1:2012cv00401
Plaintiff:
Brigham Young University-Hawaii
Defendant:
Hamberger Industriewerke GmbH, Haro Sports USA, Pro Star, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2012cv00336
Plaintiff:
George K. Young, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Neil Abercrombie, David M. Louie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cambra v. Young Brothers, Limited
as 1:2012cv00276
Plaintiff:
Wayne Cambra
Defendant:
Young Brothers, Limited
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Adric v. Young Brothers, Limited
as 1:2012cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ryan Adric
Defendant:
Young Brothers, Limited
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Young v. County of Hawaii et al
as 1:2011cv00580
Plaintiff:
Warne Keahi Young
Defendant:
County of Hawaii, Hawaii Island Humane Society S.P.C.A., Donna Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
