Voting Cases filed in Mississippi
Cases 51 - 60 of 92
Panola county, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP et al v. Panola County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00043
Plaintiff: Panola county, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP , Arrece Webb and Isom Robinson
Defendant: Panola County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors , Panola County, Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee , Panola County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee and others
Movant: Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Hazlehurst, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP et al v. Copiah County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2011cv00121
Plaintiff: Hazlehurst, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP and Nanette Thurmond-Smith
Defendant: Copiah County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors , Copiah County, Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee , Copiah County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee and others
Intervenor_defendant: Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grenada County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP et al v. Grenada County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00028
Plaintiff: Grenada County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP and Dianna Freelon-Foster
Defendant: Grenada County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors , Grenada County, Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee, Grenada County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee and others
Movant: Jim Hood
Intervenor: Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Pike County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP v. Pike County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2011cv00122
Plaintiff: Frank Lee and Pike County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP
Defendant: Pike County, Mississippi Board Of Supervisors , Pike County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee, Pike County, Mississippi Board of Election Commissioners and others
Intervenor_defendant: Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Madison County Board of Supervisors et al v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI et al
as 3:2011cv00119
Plaintiff: Madison County Board of Supervisors and John W. Robinson , III
Defendant: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI , Lee Westbrook , Madison County Republican Executive Committee and others
Movant: City of Madison, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Hancock County Board of Supervisors v. Ruhr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00564
Plaintiff: Hancock County Board of Supervisors
Defendant: Karen Ladner Ruhr, Hancock County Republican Executive Committee and Hancock County Democratic Executive Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Jackson v. Parker Hanifin Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00195
Plaintiff: Gloria S. Jackson
Defendant: Parker Hanifin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Tucker et al v. Hosemann et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00178
Plaintiff: Earl Tucker , Arthur Hotshot Ankston , Curtis Rerun Jackson and others
Defendant: Delbert Hosemann, Jim Hood and State Election Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Civil Rights Voting
McIntosh et al v. Barbour et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00072
Plaintiff: Pierce McIntosh , Betty Davis , Roy Stanford and others
Defendant: Haley Barbour, James Hood and The Mississippi Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Cunningham et al v. Leigh et al
as 1:2010cv00049
Plaintiff: Ruby Cunningham, Willie H. McNairy and Ladie M. James
Defendant: Chester Leigh, Michael Jackson, Loretta Braylock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?