Cases 51 - 60 of 122
Wheat Street Associates v. Synovus Bank
as 3:2015cv01385
Plaintiff:
Wheat Street Associates
Defendant:
Synovus Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Synovus Bank v. Wellock et al
as 9:2014cv04224
Plaintiff:
Synovus Bank
Defendant:
Francis E Wellock, Jr, William S Stoner, Jon M Kraut and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
LVI Environmental Services Inc v. MDM Services Corporation
as 1:2014cv04076
Petitioner:
LVI Environmental Services Inc
Respondent:
MDM Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Synovus Bank v. Neal
as 3:2014cv04068
Plaintiff:
Synovus Bank
Defendant:
Sue L Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Synovus Bank v. James et al
as 6:2014cv02260
Plaintiff:
Synovus Bank
Defendant:
Katherine S James and Timothy D James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Synovus Bank v. Mitchell et al
as 9:2014cv02258
Plaintiff:
Synovus Bank
Defendant:
Paul R Mitchell and Stacey A Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sincere Finance Company LLC v. Helton et al
as 3:2014cv02232
Plaintiff:
Sincere Finance Company LLC
Defendant:
Susan W Helton, James R Wessinger, Dena Hertz Wessinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Synovus Bank v. Nardone Enterprises Inc et al
as 9:2014cv02057
Plaintiff:
Synovus Bank
Defendant:
Nardone Enterprises Inc, Richard C Nardone, Alix Nardone and others
Cross_claimant:
David Dailey
Cross_defendant:
Richard C Nardone and Nardone Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Synovus Bank v. C&P Partnership LLC et al
as 4:2014cv01979
Plaintiff:
Synovus Bank
Defendant:
C&P Partnership LLC , Bhupendra Patel and Pradipkumar Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Synovus Bank v. Aborscape Tree Preservation LLC et al
as 2:2014cv01819
Plaintiff:
Synovus Bank
Defendant:
Aborscape Tree Preservation LLC, David M Christmas and David W Mantek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
