Cases 51 - 60 of 5,984
Samuel Trelawney Hughes v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv09200
Petitioner:
Samuel Trelawney Hughes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Michael Rivera Delgado v. United States of America
as 8:2023cv01995
Petitioner:
Michael Rivera Delgado
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hassan Kanyike v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv08789
Petitioner:
Hassan Kanyike
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mendoza v. USA
as 3:2023cv01853
Petitioner:
Hector Eliseo Mendoza
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Montoya v. USA
as 3:2023cv01860
Petitioner:
Cynthia Leon Montoya
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Iouri Mikhel v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv08403
Petitioner:
Iouri Mikhel
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
(HC) Arauza v. USA (2255- (2:18-cr-00202)
as 2:2023cv02263
Petitioner:
Gabriel Vicente Arauza
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chavez v. USA
as 1:2023cv01438
Petitioner:
Filiberto Chavez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jurijus Kadamovas v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv08289
Petitioner:
Jurijus Kadamovas
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Flucas v. USA
as 2:2023cv02164
Petitioner:
Rodney Flucas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
