Cases 51 - 60 of 77,235
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sindaco v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Volusia)
as 3:2024cv00429
Petitioner:
Robert E Sindaco
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cleveland v. Blizzard et al
as 6:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Lamundrick R Cleveland
Defendant:
Attorney Jason T Blizzard, Circuit Judge Kathryn D. Weston and Asst State Attorney Amie M Assent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walleske v. Childs et al
as 8:2024cv01044
Plaintiff:
Clarence E. Walleske
Defendant:
Larry Childs, Ronterrious Williams, John Does 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaffer v. State of Florida
as 8:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Shaffer
Defendant:
Temple Terrace Police Department, Extended Stay America, Elizabeth Lorenzo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Augustin, Jose A. v. Lin et al
as 9:2024cv80551
Plaintiff:
Jose Anderson Augustin
Defendant:
Adam Lin and Swigert Anthony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
RUMPH v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00191
Petitioner:
TAVARES RUMPH
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FARNEY v. GEO GROUP
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
ADAM C FARNEY
Defendant:
GEO GROUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez, Joseph v. Broward County Sheriff et al
as 0:2024cv60716
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Sanchez
Defendant:
Broward County Sheriff, Keshondra T. Davis, Unknown Deputy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
