Cases 61 - 70 of 13,269
Cunningham v. Johnson
as 2:2024mc00567
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Bradley Johnson
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Menard et al v. Blanchard et al
as 5:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
G Sid Menard, Jr and American Tile & Marble Co Inc
Defendant:
Jeffrey Paul Blanchard and Blanchard Construction Services L L C
Whitney Oil & Gas, LLC et al v Valve & Wellhead Specialist LLC
as 2:2024cv00570
Not Yet Classified:
Valve & Wellhead Specialists, LLC
Plaintiff:
Whitney Oil & Gas, LLC, Underwriters and DP Louisiana LLC
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Free v. Landry
as 5:2021cv01642
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peiffer v. Latter & Blum Holding, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
Joseph C Peiffer
Defendant:
Latter & Blum Holding, LLC, Latter & Blum Ltd. and Latter & Blum Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Long v. Mercedes-Benz USA L L C
as 1:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Robert Long
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Mercedes-Benz U S A L L C
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hargrave et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA L L C
as 6:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hargrave and Natalie Deshotels Hargrave
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Mercedes-Benz U S A L L C
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Bernard v. Hyundai Motor America Corp
as 6:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Tracie Bernard
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America Corporation and Hyundai Motor America Corp
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Routon v. General Motors, LLC
as 3:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Scott Routon
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
