Cases 61 - 70 of 163
Desmond v. Phelps et al
as 1:2017cv00218
Petitioner:
Christopher R. Desmond
Respondent:
Perry Phelps, Delaware Department of Corrections, James T. Vaughn Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parkell v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv00157
Plaintiff:
Donald D. Parkell
Defendant:
David Pierce, Unknown Number of John and Jane Does, Phillip Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kostyshyn v. Coupe et al
as 1:2017cv00147
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
John Does, Robert M. Coupe, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kostyshyn v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv00149
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
John Does, David Pierce, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kostyshyn v. Robinson et al
as 1:2017cv00136
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
Sue L. Robinson, John A. Cerino, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kostyshyn v. Coupe et al
as 1:2017cv00132
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
Robert M. Coupe, Perry Phelps, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sweetman, Jr. v. ATK Severance Plan-General of the Alliant Techsystems, Inc. Welfare Benefit Plan et al
as 1:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Sweetman, Jr.
Defendant:
ATK Severance Plan-General of the Alliant Techsystems, Inc. Welfare Benefit Plan, ATK Pension and Retirement Appeal Committee and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
O'Neal v. Connection's Medical Care et al
as 1:2016cv01228
Plaintiff:
Bradley M. O'Neal
Defendant:
Connection's Medical Care, Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kostyshyn v. DuPree et al
as 1:2016cv01173
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
N DuPree, Figeroa, Patrick Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
