Cases 61 - 70 of 116
Robertson v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv01351
Petitioner:
Frederick J. Robertson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Daboni v. Coleman et al
as 3:2017cv00502
Plaintiff:
Jacques Daboni
Defendant:
John Coleman , Kathleen Meehan-de la Cruz , Hannah Kroggel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv01912
Plaintiff:
Nicole Marie Robertson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Samuels v. City of Cleveland Heights et al
as 1:2016cv01786
Plaintiff:
Regina Samuels
Defendant:
City of Cleveland Heights , City of Cleveland Heights Police Department , City of Cleveland Heights Fire Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
French et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2016cv01777
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Riley Power, Inc., CBS Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
French, Donald R French and Charlene French
Cross Defendant:
Allied Glove Corporation, Atlas Industries, Inc., Beazer East, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Robertson v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 1:2016dp20115
Plaintiff:
James Robertson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. USA
as 1:2016cv01617
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Frederick J. Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Price v. Management & Training Corp. et al
as 3:2016cv01518
Plaintiff:
George J. Price
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp., John Does, Neil Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robertson v. USA
as 3:2015cv01548
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Antonio Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
