Cases 61 - 70 of 104
Karlin v. Cotiviti Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01193
Defendant:
Elizabeth Connolly Alexander, Cotiviti Holdings, Inc., Rube Jose King-Shaw, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Muriel Karlin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Rosenblatt v. Cotiviti Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01149
Defendant:
Elizabeth Connolly Alexander, Cotiviti Holdings, Inc., David Swift and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenblatt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Geller v. Cotiviti Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01110
Defendant:
Elizabeth Connolly Alexander, R. Halsey Wise, Rube Jose King-Shaw, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Geller
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
King v. Bazaarvoice, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01866
Plaintiff:
Harold King
Defendant:
Bazaarvoice, Inc., Thomas J. Meredith, Gene Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
King v. Phelps et al
as 1:2017cv01045
Petitioner:
Robert King
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Dana Metzger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. Payne et al
as 1:2017cv00798
Respondent:
Kyle Payne and Sheriff Irwin Carmichael
Petitioner:
Keith King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Weaver v. At Home Infucare, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00909
Plaintiff:
Oscar Weaver
Defendant:
At Home Infucare, LLC and George King Aboagye
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
King v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00839
Petitioner:
David King
Respondent:
Robert M. Coupe, Alan Grinstead and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jaroslawicz v. M&T Bank Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv00897
Plaintiff:
David Jaroslawicz
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation, Hudson City Bancorp Inc. , Robert G. Wilmers and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Turnage v. Oettel et al
as 1:2015cv00696
Plaintiff:
Damarius T. Turnage
Defendant:
Bill Oettel, Kelly, King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
