Cases 61 - 70 of 141
Darling v. Rex
as 2:2016cv02323
Plaintiff:
Emily Darling
Defendant:
Samuel Rex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Carrillo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2016cv02077
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carrillo
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2016cv01917
Plaintiff:
Samuel Perez
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01862
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Beasley IV v. Williams et al
as 2:2016cv01790
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian Williams
Petitioner:
Samuel Nathaniel Beasley IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ontiveros v. USA
as 2:2016cv01467
Petitioner:
Samuel Ontiveros
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rodriguez v. USA
as 2:2016cv01332
Petitioner:
Samuel Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rodriguez v. USA
as 2:2016cv01333
Petitioner:
Samuel Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bogneas v. Samuels
as 3:2016cv00314
Petitioner:
Palle Bogneas
Respondent:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Compagnie Maritime Marfret v. Natural Waters, Inc., et al.
as 2:2016cv01211
Plaintiff:
Compagnie Maritime Marfret
Defendant:
Larry J. Lucas, Natural Waters, Inc. and Samuel J. Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
