Cases 61 - 70 of 82
Hicks v. Foster et al
as 2:2011cv01484
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Sheryl Foster
Petitioner:
Joyce Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicks v. State of Nevada
as 2:2011cv01412
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Hicks
Defendant:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Myles et al
as 2:2011cv01318
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Carolyn Myles
Petitioner:
Joyce Hicks
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 3373 Appeal of Decision - DOI
Hicks v. State Of Nevada
as 3:2011cv00478
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Hicks
Defendant:
Nevada, State Of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Roger et al
as 3:2011cv00185
Defendant:
Atty Gen Catherine Masto Cortez, Jim Gibbons, Jack Palmer and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Roger et al
as 2:2011cv00104
Defendant:
Jim Gibbons, David Roger, Jack Palmer and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fodor v. Doe et al
as 3:2010cv00798
Defendant:
John Doe and Phillip Maurice Hicks , SC
Plaintiff:
Thomas F. (Tim) Fodor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02190
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
NOT USED
as 2:2010cv01350
Defendant:
Bank Of America, First Centennial Title, Thomas Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Anita Valenzuela
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Valenzuela v. Lime Financial Services, Ltd. et al
as 3:2010cv00502
Defendant:
Bank Of America, N.A., First Centennial Title Company, Thomas Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Anita Valenzuela
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
