Cases 61 - 70 of 395
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03670
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jiang v. BlueCity Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2021cv04044
Plaintiff:
Junhui Jiang
Defendant:
BlueCity Holdings Limited, Baoli Ma, Zhiyong Li and others
Petitioner:
Shiyuan Zhu, Hui Yan Huang and Patrick Van der Schueren
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jiang v. D&S Wedding Planner Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00643
Plaintiff:
Haiyan Jiang
Defendant:
D&S Wedding Planner Inc., D&S Grocery Store Inc., Danny Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Li v. Multicultural Radio Broadcasting, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00572
Plaintiff:
Ying Li
Defendant:
Multicultural Radio Broadcasting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
