Cases 61 - 70 of 255
HUNTER v. FORMAN MILLS, INC.
as 2:2021cv01706
Defendant:
FORMAN MILLS, INC., FORMAN MILLS and AMTRAK
Plaintiff:
CHANISE HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LASSITER v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSANGER CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv01576
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE V. LASSITER
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSANGER CORPORATION doing business as AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05612
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MITCHELL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv01582
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and THE NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP DBA AMTRAK
Plaintiff:
RON MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
DEBES et al v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2021cv01117
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, JOHN DOE, INC. 1, AMTRAK and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA A., DEBES and WALTER DEBES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FOLTZ v. AMTRAK
as 5:2021cv01165
Plaintiff:
WALTER FOLTZ
Defendant:
AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mitchell v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2020cv06152
Plaintiff:
Robert Mitchell
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
Nelson v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv06347
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION doing business as AMTRAK, JOHN DOES I-V, BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST and others
Plaintiff:
Naomi Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05922
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
