Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Knox v. Feinerman et al
as 3:2007cv00886
Plaintiff:
Christopher Knox
Defendant:
Dr Feinerman, Pam Grubman, G Summers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knox v. Rhodes et al
as 3:2007cv00835
Plaintiff:
Christopher Knox
Defendant:
Kelly Rhodes, Rakesh Chandra, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitfield v. Adamson et al
as 3:2007cv00819
Plaintiff:
BenYehudah Whitfield
Defendant:
C/O Adamson, Neil C. Bantican, R Baylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simons v. Shaw et al
as 1:2007cv01252
Plaintiff:
Rudi Simons
Defendant:
F Shaw, Terry McCann, Roger Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simons v. Shaw et al
as 3:2007cv03258
Plaintiff:
Rudi Simons
Defendant:
F Shaw, Terry McCann, Roger Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaBoy v. Johnson et al
as 1:2007cv04434
Plaintiff:
Hector LaBoy
Defendant:
Elizabeth Johnson, Regina Marshall, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brockington v. Scott et al
as 3:2007cv03207
Plaintiff:
LaRenzo C Brockington
Defendant:
Bryant C Scott, Brian Fairchild and Roger E Walker, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Podkulski v. Walker et al
as 1:2007cv02324
Plaintiff:
Steven Podkulski
Defendant:
Roger Walker, Jr., Warden McCann, Warden Barruglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Jordan et al
as 3:2007cv00409
Plaintiff:
Julio C. Allen
Defendant:
Cynthia Jordan, Carol McBride, Sherry Benton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marsiliano v. Walker et al
as 1:2007cv01092
Plaintiff:
Anthony Marsiliano
Defendant:
Rodger Walker, Melody Ford and Brian Fairchild
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
