Cases 61 - 70 of 329
Jennings v. Black
as 3:2022cv00134
Petitioner:
Lemarr Jennings
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Redden v. Black et al
as 1:2022cv00694
Plaintiff:
James F. Redden
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Black and Attorney General of the State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Black
as 1:2022cv00662
Petitioner:
Otis S. Miller
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Black
as 5:2022cv00623
Petitioner:
Coren Harris
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harvey v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00538
Plaintiff:
Norman Harvey and Norman F. Harvey
Defendant:
Jennifer Gillece Black, Annette Chambers-Smith, Mr. Gerren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitacre v. Monroe County Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2022cv01809
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Whitacre
Defendant:
Monroe County Correctional Facility, Sheriff Charles Black, Jr. and Major Rick Shipp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings v. Black
as 1:2022cv00379
Petitioner:
Lemarr Jennings
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Black v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01388
Plaintiff:
William Black
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arnoff v. Black
as 1:2022cv00375
Petitioner:
Bruce Arnoff
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stuart v. Black
as 1:2022cv00362
Petitioner:
Donald J. Stuart
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
