Cases 61 - 70 of 234
Marian Owens v. Warden, et al
as 19-11553
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PULASKI SP WARDEN
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIAN PAPACSI OWENS
Richard Daniel v. Commissioner, Georgia Dept.
as 19-10923
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD E. DANIEL
Tammy Nesbitt v. Commissioner, Georgia DOC
as 19-10506
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMMY NESBITT
Tammy Nesbitt v. Commissioner, Georgia DOC
as 19-10530
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMMY NESBITT
Delroy Booth v. Warden, et al
as 19-10283
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and UNIT MANAGER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELROY T. BOOTH
Lester Smith v. Greg Dozier, et al
as 18-13318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER J. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
GREG DOZIER, SHARON LEWIS, M.D., COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Rodolfo Martinez v. Commissioner, Georgia DOC, et al
as 18-12597
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODOLFO L. MARTINEZ, a.k.a. Zenith E. Vivas
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and VANCE LAUGHLIN
Torrell Young v. Commissioner, Georgia DOC
as 18-12260
Petitioner - Appellant:
TORRELL M. YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Delroy Booth v. Lieutenant R. Allen, et al
as 18-12136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DELROY T. BOOTH
Defendant - Appellee:
R. ALLEN, Correctional Officer of Georgia Department of Corrections, J. SMITH, Correctional Officer of Georgia Department of Corrections, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Roy Chambers, Jr. v. Warden, et al
as 18-11958
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROY LEE CHAMBERS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
