Cases 61 - 70 of 436
May v. Godinez et al
as 3:2016cv50117
Plaintiff:
Aaron May
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez, Joseph Yurkovich, Nedra Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thames et al v. Godinez et al
as 3:2016cv50107
Plaintiff:
Linord Thames
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez, Joseph Yurkovick, Nedra Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2016cv04521
Plaintiff:
Joseph Chandler
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly USA, LLC, Acrux Commercial Pty Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pryor v. S.A. Godinez et al.
as 3:2016cv50105
Plaintiff:
Priest Pryor
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez, Joseph Yurkovich, Nedra Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleming v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv50074
Plaintiff:
Darryl Fleming
Defendant:
Donald Stolworthy, Joseph Yurkovich, Nedra Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edens v. Godinez et al
as 3:2016cv50075
Plaintiff:
James R. Edens
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez, Joseph Yurkovich, Nedra Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edens v. Godinez et al
as 1:2016cv50075
Plaintiff:
James R. Edens
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez, Joseph Yurkovich, Nedra Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Robinson v. Melvin et al
as 3:2016cv50053
Plaintiff:
Gregory Robinson
Defendant:
Christopher Melvin, Lisa Devert, Nedra Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guru Denim, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv02832
Plaintiff:
Guru Denim, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Li Chen, Adam Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Mack v. Chandler et al
as 3:2016cv50036
Plaintiff:
Henry L. Mack
Defendant:
Nedra Chandler, Haimes, McGowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
