Cases 61 - 70 of 87
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv08879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Victoria Kathrein, et al v. City of Evanston, Illinois, et al
as 12-2958
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTORIA KATHREIN and MICHAEL L. KATHREIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF EVANSTON, ILLINOIS, LORRAINE H. MORTON, Mayor, CHERYL WOLLIN, Alderwoman, 1st Ward and others
Davies v. City Of Evanston
as 1:2012cv05839
Defendant:
Illinois City Of Evanston
Plaintiff:
Olufemi Davies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HSBC Bank USA, NA v. Sanders et al
as 1:2011cv07441
Plaintiff:
HSBC Bank USA, NA
Defendant:
Olga Kimarra Sanders, City Of Evanston and JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roehl v. Merrilees et al
as 1:2011cv04886
Plaintiff:
Pamela K. Roehl
Defendant:
Robert D. Merrilees, James L Rubens, Village Of Wilmette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PNC Bank, National Association v. Mike Citco Corp., et al
as 1:2011cv03666
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Mike Citco Corp., Rucarre Elpenord, Hausselet Elpenord and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2010cv07733
Plaintiff:
Ronald Williams
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and City Of Evanston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Banaei v. City of Evanston et al
as 1:2010cv06966
Plaintiff:
Jaleh Banaei
Defendant:
City of Evanston, Messing and Niziolek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Shumpert et al v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv04425
Plaintiff:
Everett Drayden Shumpert and Hebrew Methodological Institute
Defendant:
The United States of America, Barack Obama, Richard Durbin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
