Cases 61 - 70 of 102
Bousley v. Neven et al
as 2:2011cv01751
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Antoine Bousley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elizonda v Neven et al
as 2:2011cv01735
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Zeferino Elizonda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hopkins v. Neven et al
as 2:2011cv01685
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Tyon Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Damon Campbell v. Colin Brown, et al
as 11-17464
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMON L. CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
COLIN BROWN, CONRAD SCHAFF, ISIDRO BACA and others
Arrendondo v. Brooks et al
as 3:2011cv00704
Plaintiff:
Armis Arrendondo
Defendant:
D. Brooks, B. Connett, R. Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. Neven et al
as 2:2011cv01434
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Tyon Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Clark v. D.W. Neven, et al
as 11-16702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
D.W. NEVEN and PHARRIS, Ms., Librarian
Carpenter v. Neven et al
as 2:2011cv00867
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Ernest Dean Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Brown et al
as 3:2011cv00290
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Colin Brown, Cole Morrow and others
Plaintiff:
Damon L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Neven et al
as 2:2011cv00556
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Breck W. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
