Cases 61 - 70 of 94
Hopkins v. Neven et al
as 2:2011cv01434
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Tyon Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carpenter v. Neven et al
as 2:2011cv00867
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Ernest Dean Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Brown et al
as 3:2011cv00290
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Colin Brown, Cole Morrow and others
Plaintiff:
Damon L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Neven et al
as 2:2011cv00556
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Breck W. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres v. Neven
as 2:2011cv00518
Respondent:
D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Alberto Caro Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. D. W. Neven et al
as 2:2011cv00400
Plaintiff:
Nathan D Campbell
Defendant:
D. Cool, D. Fierro, Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deleon v. Neven et al
as 2:2010cv01348
Petitioner:
Steven Deleon
Respondent:
Nevada Department Of Corrections, D.W. Neven and State Of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wentzell v. Neven et al
as 2:2010cv01024
Respondent:
Attorney General and D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Christopher Noel Wentzell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Neven
as 2:2010cv00944
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark
Defendant:
D.W. Neven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Walkup v. Neven et al
as 2:2010cv00475
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
