Cases 61 - 70 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Woodall Family Enterprises, LLLP v. Estate of Abraham Hirschfeld et al
as 1:2009cv02197
Plaintiff:
Woodall Family Enterprises, LLLP
Defendant:
Estate of Abraham Hirschfeld, Elie Hirschfeld, Georgia Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Type:
Other Statutes
McKinney et al v. Clayton County et al
as 1:2009cv02014
Plaintiff:
Diallo McKinney and Marcus McKinney
Defendant:
Clayton County, Clayton County, Clayton County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Type:
Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Department of Transportation v. 0.133 acres of land et al
as 1:2007cv03030
Plaintiff:
Department of Transportation
Defendant:
0.133 acres of land, Norfolk and Southern Railway Company, Evelyn Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 10762 Interstate Commerce Act/General Tariff Requirements
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
