Cases 61 - 70 of 73
NIKE, INC. v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2010cv01908
Plaintiff:
NIKE, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
KUNST v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2010cv01608
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN S. KUNST
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER FOSSLER, ANTHONY PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRONE v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2010cv01341
Plaintiff:
DARRELL CRONE
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER FOSSLER, ANTHONY PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2010cv01191
Plaintiff:
MELVIN GREEN
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER FOSSLER, ANTHONY PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOKES v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2010cv01193
Plaintiff:
WILLIE STOKES
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER FOSSLER, ANTHONY PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEWARD v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2010cv01194
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL STEWARD
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER FOSSLER, ANTHONY PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2010cv01192
Plaintiff:
CARLTON SIMMONS
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER FOSSLER, ANTHONY PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAHMAN v. ERIC TAYLOR et al
as 1:2010cv00367
Plaintiff:
RONALD RAHMAN
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR, DEPUTY WARDEN WALKER, DEPUTY WARDEN PIZARRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TIMS v. WIDMANN, MD et al
as 2:2009cv04823
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TIMS
Defendant:
MARK D. WIDMANN, MD, AARON H. CHEVINSKY, MD, CARLOS MARTINEZ, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
YUZARY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv05030
Petitioner:
HAIM YUZARY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HARLEY LAPPIN, JEFF GRONDOLSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
