Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Birthmark v. Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Birthmark
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Montana State Prison, Board of Pardons and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birthmark v. Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2012cv00211
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Birthmark
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Montana State Prison, Board of Pardons and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birthmark v. Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Birthmark
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Montana State Prison, Board of Pardons and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HeitKemper v. Rantz et al
as 6:2012cv00088
Plaintiff:
Gerald HeitKemper
Defendant:
Dr. Rantz, Dr. Kohut and Ms. Schnee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sledge v. Redfern et al
as 6:2012cv00077
Plaintiff:
David Dwain Sledge
Defendant:
Cathy Redfern, Dr. Rantz, Jeannie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harriman v. Kohut et al
as 6:2012cv00056
Plaintiff:
Ronney Harriman
Defendant:
Tristan Kohut and Dr. Rantz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fritsch v. Ferriter et al
as 6:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
William Fritsch
Defendant:
Mike Ferriter, Dr. Kohut, Dr. Rantz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Ferriter et al
as 6:2012cv00019
Plaintiff:
William John Henry
Defendant:
Mike Ferriter, Leroy Kirkegard, Todd Boise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eastman v. Swanson et al
as 6:2011cv00073
Plaintiff:
Franklin Corbin Eastman
Defendant:
Ross Swanson, Mike Mahoney, Myron E. Beeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Dr. Kohut et al
as 6:2011cv00067
Plaintiff:
Brandon J. Burns
Defendant:
Dr. Kohut, Mike Ferriter and MSP Medical Dir.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
