Cases 61 - 70 of 212
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05796
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Corporate Executive Board Company
as 1:2015cv04158
Plaintiff:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent:
Corporate Executive Board Company
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Osborne v. O'Reilly Auto Parts et al
as 1:2015cv03854
Plaintiff:
Patrick Osborne
Defendant:
O'Reilly Auto Parts and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUFORD v. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 1:2015cv03383
Plaintiff:
BARBRIELLE BUFORD
Defendant:
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rich Township High School District 227
as 1:2015cv01922
Plaintiff:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant:
Rich Township High School District 227
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rich Township High School District 227
as 1:2015cv01924
Plaintiff:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant:
Rich Township High School District 227
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01356
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
