Cases 61 - 70 of 240
Boulette et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00031
Plaintiff:
Ernest P. Boulette, III and Linda Boulette
Defendant:
Ethicon, LLC, Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dalberg et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00030
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, LLC, Ethicon Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Dalberg and Rebecca Dalberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Templin et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00013
Plaintiff:
Cherie Templin and Robert Templin
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Linder et al v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00058
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Linder and Paulada S Linder
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FILING ERROR
as 1:2019cv01155
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Norma Machuca Hernandez and Jose Luis Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Norma M. Hernandez, et al v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as 5:2019cv01383
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Norma Machuca Hernandez and Jose Luis Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Coates v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv02584
Plaintiff:
Leslie Coates
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Coloplast Corp, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Famigletti et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv02585
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc, Sofradim Production SAS, Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Famigletti and Michael Famigletti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patterson v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 3:2019cv02586
Plaintiff:
David Patterson and Kaye W Patterson
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 7:2019cv00123
Plaintiff:
Constance Hill
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
